basic feature doctrine造句
例句與造句
- Chua J . rejected the application of the basic features doctrine in Singapore.
- Thus, this suggests there is no place for the basic features doctrine in constitutional amendments.
- Justice Ray presented other problems of the basic features doctrine, criticizing it as being uncertain in scope.
- On the other hand, Justice Ajit Nath Ray dissented and gave reasons for rejecting the basic features doctrine.
- A contrary opinion notes that the basic features doctrine is necessary to provide a legal safeguard for the basic structure of the Constitution.
- It's difficult to find basic feature doctrine in a sentence. 用basic feature doctrine造句挺難的
- Such changes may not have happened or may have faced the possibility of being pronounced unconstitutional by the courts if the basic features doctrine was applicable in Singapore.
- The High Court of Singapore denied the application of the basic features doctrine in Singapore in " Teo Soh Lung v . Minister for Home Affairs ".
- On appeal, the Court of Appeal determined the case on other grounds, and thus found it unnecessary to decide conclusively if the basic features doctrine applies in Singapore.
- The development of the basic features doctrine in India can be attributed to the role of the judiciary in maintaining a balance between the powers of the Parliament and the judiciary.
- However, the basic features doctrine was rejected by the Court of Appeal found it unnecessary to rule on whether the position taken by the High Court is correct or not.
- The basic structure or basic features doctrine developed by the Supreme Court of India, which means that Parliament is not precluded from amending or repealing any provisions of the Constitution, even those considered as basic.
- Furthermore, Chua asserted that allowing the courts to impose limitations on the legislature through the basic features doctrine, a judge-made rule, would amount to the judiciary usurping Parliament's legislative function.
- The Federal Court of Malaysia, then housed in the Sultan Abdul Samad Building in Kuala Lumpur, rejected the application of the basic features doctrine in " Phang Chin Hock v . Public Prosecutor " ( 1980 ).
- In Malaysia, the basic features doctrine was also found to be inapplicable by the constituent assembly representative of the Indian people in territorial, racial and community terms, while both the Malaysian and Singapore Constitutions were enacted by ordinary legislatures.
- In " Kesavananda " the Supreme Court had acknowledged the validity of the Twenty-fourth Amendment, yet Chief Justice Sikri seemed not to have considered the meaning of " repeal " when enunciating the basic features doctrine.
更多例句: 下一頁